Tag Archives: body

What Kind of Body?

Posted on by
Reply
This wall painting from the Dura Europa synagogue in Syria depicts the raising of the dead from the dry bones, described in Ezekiel 37.


But someone will say, “How can the dead be raised? What kind of body will they have?” You fool! What you yourself sow does not come to life unless it dies. As for what you sow, you do not sow the body that will be but only a naked seed, such as wheat or something else. (1 Cor. 15:35-37)

Greek thinkers were disgusted at the thought that a dead body would be raised by God. They taught that the soul was immortal and that at death, it was set free from the prison of the body. That’s why pre-Christians and non-Christians often cremated the dead: to destroy the jail that was the body and liberate the soul.

Jews, like the Apostle Paul, did not believe in the immortality of the soul. They taught that the dead would be raised, body and soul together. A person was not complete without both a body AND a soul. The body was not a prison that a soul was trapped in; a body was an essential aspect of human reality. Early Christians taught that a human body was an aspect of the image and likeness of God that the human race was created to be.

The body is not the obstacle that prevents us from entering the Kingdom of God but rather our willful wickedness.

St. John Chrysostom, Homily 41 on 1st Corinthians

But none of the Jewish or Christian thinkers thought the resurrected bodies would just be our natural bodies resuscitated. The resurrected body of a person would be different somehow from the natural body before death. But no one was sure how the body would be different.

Origen thought our bodies would all be round, like beach balls, because the sphere is the perfect shape. Others thought our bodies would all look as they did when we were 33 years old since that is the age Jesus was when he was raised from the dead. Others said that the resurrected body would be gloriously bright, like Jesus’ body at the Transfiguration.

The resurrected body was described as “spiritual.” This did not mean “immaterial” or “ethereal.” St. Paul always uses the word flesh to mean “fallen, sinful.” He uses the word spiritual to mean “godly, saved.” Our resurrected bodies will not be sinful but godly, permeated and saturated with the Spirit and glory of God. Just as Jesus had a spiritual body after the Resurrection that could eat and drink and that the apostles could touch, so our bodies will be touchable but able to walk through locked doors and appear or disappear from rooms.

Certain saints are able to display some of these qualities even before they die, working various miracles by the Spirit of God that is already saturating their bodies because they have been washed with the water of baptism, anointed with the holy chrism, and consumed the Body and Blood of Christ in Holy Communion. Which is also why their bodies (i.e. relics) are able to perform miracles after they die. Our bodies display characteristics of the resurrection even before being raised because they are already becoming spiritual, i.e. godly.

Can the Eye Say to the Hand, “I Don’t Need You”?

Posted on by
Reply
The depiction of the hand of God stood in the presence of God himself, as in this hand of God the Father seen above the Cross, clutching a wreath of victory, San Clemente, Rome, AD 1140–43. Read here for more about the Hand of God in ancient-medieval Jewish and Christian art.


For just as the body is one and has many members and all the members of the body, although many, are one body, so also is Christ…. If the foot says, “Because I am not a hand, I am not of the body,” is it for this reason less a part of the body? (1 Cor. 12:12-15)

St. Paul was not the only one to talk about the Church as if it were a body. St. Jerome wrote

The Church has real eyes: its teachers and leaders who see the mysteries of God in the sacred Scriptures…. The Church has feet: those who make official journeys of all kinds. The foot runs that the hand may find the work it should do. The eye does not scorn the hand, nor do the eyes, hands, and feet scorn the belly as if it were idle and unemployed.

Homily 85 on the Gospel According to St. Matthew

I think the best example of body imagery is what St. Augustine wrote:

Aren’t the hairs of your head certainly of less value than your other members? What is cheaper and more despicable and lowly than the hairs of your head? Yet if the barber gives you a bad haircut, you become angry at him for doing a bad job and cutting your hair unevenly. But you are not as concerned about the unity of the members of the Church as you are about the hairs on your head.

On the Usefulness of Fasting 6

How new was all this body imagery? Philosophers who were writing at the same time as St. Paul also used body imagery as a way to talk about society. Seneca wrote:

What if the hands should desire to harm the feet or the eyes the hands? As all the members of the body are in harmony with one another because it is to the advantage of the whole that individual members be unharmed….

On Anger, 2.31.7

A Roman fable told the story of hands, mouth, and teeth rebelling against the stomach, with the result that the whole body is harmed. (Livy, History of Rome 2.32.7-33.1) Other fables and philosophers compared political unrest to disease or self-harm (such as cutting).

Jewish writers like Josephus and Philo also used body imagery. “As in the body, all the members get sick if the principal members are inflamed….” and the high priest asks for blessings in order “that every age and every part of the nation be regarded as a single body, united in one and the same fellowship, making peace and good order their aim.”

A few decades after St. Paul wrote, St. Clement of Rome also write to the Corinthians. St. Clement also used body imagery to appeal to the Corinthians to embrace harmony and set aside discord.

Let us take our body as an example. The head without the feet is nothing; likewise the feet without the head are nothing: even the smallest limbs of our body are necessary and useful for the whole body; but all the members conspire and unite in subjection, that the whole body may be saved.”

1 Clement 37

I highly recommend Raymond Collins’ commentary on First Corinthians in the Sacra Pagina series.

Spiritual Milk

Posted on by
Reply
Madonna di San Gugliemo, 12th century (Sienna, Italy). This depiction of the “Madonna Lactans” (Nursing Madonna) is a eucharistic image as much as it is an image of a mother caring for her child. Read more about this type of image here and see more examples here.

And I, brothers and sisters, was able to speak to you not as spiritual people but only as carnal people, as infants in Christ. I gave you milk to drink, not substantial food, because you were not yet capable, nor are you capable until now, for you are fleshy people. (1 Cor. 3:1-3)

In the ancient world, milk-blood-semen were all thought to be the same liquid but warmed to differing temperatures by different internal organs. Blood was the coldest of these and the basic, most natural form of this liquid. Milk was blood, warmed and made frothy in a woman’s breasts. Semen was blood, made even warmer and frothier in a man’s testes. According to this biological idea, when a mother was nursing her child, she was feeding the baby with her own blood.

Because blood and milk were identical, the correspondence of the Virgin’s milk and Christ’s blood was important to early and medieval Christians. The Virgin’s blood becomes milk in her breasts; she nurses Christ, feeding him her warm and frothy blood; he drinks this frothy blood, which becomes the blood in his own veins. Medieval images of the Nursing Madonna (Madonna lactans) are fundamentally eucharistic images, celebrating the identity of the Virgin’s milk with Christ’s blood; she feeds him with her body which becomes his Body and he feeds the Church with his Body and Blood in the Eucharist.

There is no more vivid and elaborate exposition of 1 Corinthians 3 in early Christian literature than that found in Clement’s Paedagogus 1.6…. By combining Galatians 3:28 and 1 Corinthians 3, Clement sets the foundation for his argument that all Christians are already spiritual…and, as a result, milk-drinking infants cannot be viewed as equivalent to “carnal” Christians. Rather, milk is the food of all Christians who “seek our mother, the church.”

John David Penniman, Raised on Christian Milk

Not only did a mother’s milk (blood) provide sustenance to her baby, the infant received religious and ethnic formation as well by ingesting his/her mother’s identity via the milk-blood. This is why receiving Holy Communion was so important: to receive Christ’s blood was to be shaped and formed by his identity, according to St. Gregory of Nyssa.

Discover more about this fascinating subject in Raised on Christian Milk: Food and the Formation of the Soul in Early Christianity by John David Penniman (Yale University Press, 2017).